Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rick Pariani's avatar

Sherry - I thoroughly agree with your insight and the wisdom it offers. As a Landscape Architect for the past 46 years, I love your comment, "Lead with Landscape".

I think we would be well served if the city would hire an experienced, practiced and accomplished LA - preferably to vision, direct, lead (and grow the staff) for future efforts in a reimagined and rejuvenated Parks and Recreation Department. A Department that has voice, authority, responsibility and design oversight - not one beholden to other "powers" - one like NY's that delivered the High Line, Pier 55's Little Island, Long Island City Promenade and other remarkable city parks and open spaces. I think one of the preferred consultant teams that continue to secure plum park design commissions has an "inside" relationship with the COJ due to a key director (I'm not naming names here - you know). That type arrangement continues to feed the parochial nature of the city's approach to many important public realm projects.

I also think that the previous Riverside Plaza design effort winnowed down prospects to 3 highly competent teams. Each were awarded a $125,000 design stipend. The winner was chosen, in large part due to their inclusion of an "iconic" identity sculpture and soft, riverine-styled river edge.

Then - all hell broke loose - the city commenced bulkhead and dock repairs thus fixing the river edge and eliminating one of the features of the awarded design; the city demolished the south Main Street Bridge ramp and its all-important pedestrian link which afforded direct access into the park (to enlarge the footprint area for the residential tower); the first thing that the city's new resiliency officer said was "the park design will change"; the iconic sculpture design stubbed its toe, doesn't have public funding and presumably will be redesigned; one corner will await a signature NY architect's 44 story "midtown Manhattan" residential tower; the playground, presumably to save space, will be built atop a multi-purpose building; the street intersection of Water St/Hogan St/Independent Dr has been recently demolished, presumably to expand the northwest corner of the park (probably for another restaurant) - and now the DIA wants to carve out more space for a riverside restaurant. Let all that happen and we'll have nothing more than a park and dogwalk (synthetic turf anybody?) for the residents fortunate enough to live in the luxury tower plus a series of outdoor dining venues - and you can kiss good-bye to any functional flexibility for civic functions.

In a former life, I've know design teams that would have demanded the city enable a "do-over" after seeing how an awarded design was so substantially changed, before implementation. There's no fairness in that kind of bait-and-switch. Worse, it sends the absolute wrong message to the regional and national design community who look upon Jacksonville as simply not having its act together.

I will strive to keep hope alive and remain optimistic - looking forward to the days when smart decisions are made, decisions are kept and projects get built as envisioned and promised.

Thank you very much - Rick

PS - I do like Mr. Anderson's "Buffoons" - because our current project approaches seem very clown-like.

Expand full comment
Rick Pariani's avatar

One other thing regards Riverside Plaza (to accompany my other comment) - since the DIA has said that the 44 story residential tower would not be "due" until 2029 (likely longer) - it means that effectively, the Park will remain a construction site for another 10 years - on top of the 5 years since the Landing's demolition.

15 years to create the City's Central Riverfront Park and Civic Space - and who knows now to what $$$$ extent.

Thank you very much - Rick

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts